Castle v. Womble
Department of the Interior
19 L.D. 455 (1894)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
In 1889, Martin Womble (defendant) filed a declaratory statement recording a mineral claim with a local California land office. The next year, Walter Castle (plaintiff) located the Empire Quartz mine on land overlapping the area Womble claimed. The General Land Office (the federal agency that oversaw federal public lands at the time) cancelled Womble’s declaratory statement to the extent it overlapped the Empire Quartz mine. A few months later, Womble filed notice of intent to submit final proof of his claim. Castle filed a protest in response, based on having already located his mine on the land and showing that it contained quartz rock with enough gold to make mining profitable. After a hearing, the local land officers found that (1) the land contained enough gold to develop a mine, (2) Womble’s declaratory statement had expired, and (3) Castle’s claim had attached to the land by location. Therefore, it found that Womble would have to segregate the Empire Quartz mine from the land covered by his declaratory statement before entering the rest of his claim. Womble appealed to the land office, but it affirmed the local land officers’ decision. Womble appealed to the Department of Interior.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.