Castro v. Ballesteros-Suarez
Arizona Court of Appeals
213 P.3d 197 (2009)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Adolfo F. Suarez bought two life-insurance policies, initially naming his mother as beneficiary of both policies. Suarez later changed both policies to name his wife, Luz Ballesteros-Suarez (defendant) as beneficiary. Suarez was subsequently shot to death. Police suspected Ballesteros-Suarez of murdering Suarez but did not have probable cause to arrest her. The insurance companies filed impleader actions, requesting that the court determine whether they should distribute Suarez’s death benefit to his widow or to his mother. Suarez’s sister, Antonia Suarez Castro (plaintiff) sued Ballesteros-Suarez on behalf of Suarez’s mother, who had predeceased him. Castro asked the court to find that Ballesteros-Suarez was responsible for Suarez’s death. At trial, Castro testified that Ballesteros-Suarez had offered to pay her if she would help Ballesteros-Suarez collect the death benefits. A police officer testified concerning the significant circumstantial evidence implicating Ballesteros-Suarez in her husband’s murder. Ballesteros-Suarez exercised her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The trial court inferred from Ballesteros-Suarez’s silence, along with the unrebutted testimony against her, that she had killed her husband. Pursuant to the slayer statute, the court held that Ballesteros-Suarez was not entitled to collect Suarez’s death benefits. Ballesteros-Suarez appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Portley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.