Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
446 U.S. 643 (1980)


Facts

In 1967, a group of competing beer wholesalers (defendants) simultaneously stopped supplying interest-free credit that had formerly been granted to beer retailers. Previously, beer retailers had been able to place orders for beer on interest-free credit for up to 42 days before making payment. Prior to extinguishing the practice, the terms of such credit extensions had been a form of competition among beer wholesalers, and the credit terms between individual beer wholesalers and beer retailers tended to differ considerably. Believing that the beer wholesalers’ mutual decision to stop extending credit constituted an anticompetitive agreement in violation of antitrust law, a group of beer retailers (plaintiff) brought a lawsuit against the beer wholesalers. The beer retailers then made a motion to declare the beer wholesalers’ conduct a per se violation, but the district court denied the motion, holding that an agreement between competitors to fix credit terms is not a per se violation of antitrust law. The court of appeals affirmed the decision of the district court. The beer retailers appealed the decision, maintaining that the beer wholesalers’ actions constituted a per se antitrust violation as a form of price fixing.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.