Cate-Schweyen v. Cate

303 Mont. 232 (2000)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cate-Schweyen v. Cate

Montana Supreme Court
303 Mont. 232 (2000)

Facts

In 1988, Jerome J. Cate drafted a handwritten document entitled “Irrevocable Trust Reserving Income for Life.” The document purported to transfer mineral interests that Jerome had inherited from his mother and uncle to a trust benefitting Jerome’s daughters from his first marriage. The document named Jerome’s daughter Shannon Cate-Schweyen (plaintiff) trustee and granted Jerome a life interest in the trust property. The document granted the daughters a 20-year-term interest after Jerome’s death, followed by an outright distribution of any remaining property to the daughters or their heirs, per stirpes. Jerome specified that the document was made in contemplation of his pending marriage to JoAnn Cate (defendant). Jerome never executed a separate document conveying the mineral interests to the trust to or to Shannon as trustee. After Jerome’s death, JoAnn was appointed personal representative of his estate and refused to transfer the mineral interests to his daughters. Shannon, on her own behalf and as conservator of her sister Sara, petitioned the trial court for a declaration that the handwritten document had created a valid testamentary trust and that JoAnn was required to fund the trust with the mineral interests. JoAnn opposed the petition, arguing that the document had created an inter vivos trust that was unenforceable because Jerome had failed to fund the trust during his lifetime. The trial court found for Shannon, and JoAnn appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)

Dissent (Turnage, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership