Caulfield v. AC & D Marine
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
633 F.2d 1129 (1981)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Wayne Caulfield (plaintiff), an employee of AC & D Marine, Inc. (AC&D) (defendant), fell over an anchor while working and suffered injuries. AC&D allowed injured employees to seek treatment from private physicians. AC&D referred Caulfield to a private physician for treatment, but Caulfield sought and received treatment from a different private physician. Caulfield sued AC&D for the cost of his medical expenses on the theory that an injured seaman was entitled to recover the costs of his cure from a shipowner on whose vessel he was injured. AC&D presented no evidence that the cost of Caulfield’s treatment exceeded what it would have been had Caulfield engaged the physician to which AC&D referred him. The district court awarded Caulfield reimbursement for his medical expenses, and AC&D appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Randall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
