Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Cavalier v. Random House, Inc.

297 F.3d 815 (2002)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Cavalier v. Random House, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

297 F.3d 815 (2002)

Facts

Wanda and Christopher Cavalier (plaintiffs) wrote children’s stories about a character named Nicky Moonbeam. The stories included a few books of several thousand words and a board book for young children. In one illustration, a star is shown lounging on a cloud during the daytime. In another, a star is being polished by the main character. The board book included a night-light built into the back cover, with a smiling moon surrounded by stars and a power switch to the lower right. The general theme of the stories included traveling through the night sky and speaking with the moon and stars. The Cavaliers submitted the stories and illustrations to Random House, Incorporated (Random House) (defendant), but the submissions were rejected. Random House later published two books, Good Night, Ernie and Good Night, Elmo (the Good Night books). The books involved Ernie and Elmo traveling through the night sky accompanied by the moon. The Good Night books included illustrations of stars lounging on clouds during the day and stars being polished. The Good Night books also included a night-light depicting a smiling moon and a smiling star, with rosy cheeks, surrounded by stars and a power switch to the lower right. Each book was around 100 words long. The Cavaliers sued Random House, CTW Publishing Company, and the Children's Television Workshop Inc. (defendants) for copyright infringement. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. The district court granted the motion. The Cavaliers appealed the decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership