Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Cavel International, Inc. v. Madigan

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
500 F.3d 544 (2007)


Facts

Cavel International, Inc. (Cavel) (plaintiff) produced horse meat at an Illinois plant for human consumption. Cavel exported its entire output to Europe. Illinois passed an amendment (Amendment) to the Illinois Horse Meat Act, prohibiting the slaughter of horses in Illinois for human consumption. The law did not prohibit the slaughter of horses for other purposes, such as making pet food. Cavel sued Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan and other Illinois state officials (defendants) in their official capacities, arguing that the Amendment unconstitutionally burdened foreign commerce. The federal district court found for the defendants. Cavel appealed and, pending the appeal, sought an injunction against the defendants barring enforcement of the Amendment. Cavel argued that it would be shut down if the Amendment was applied. Further, Cavel argued that even if it won on appeal, Cavel would not be compensated for its destroyed business because it could only obtain injunctive relief rather than damages from the state. The defendants argued that the public would suffer the irreparable harm of slaughtered horses if the injunction was granted. The district court denied the injunction, and Cavel appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Easterbrook, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.