CAZA Drilling (California), Inc. v. TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
142 Cal. App. 4th 453 (2006)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc. (TEG) (defendant) hired CAZA Drilling (California), Inc. (CAZA) (plaintiff) to drill an oil well. The contract stated that “[e]xcept for such obligations and liabilities specifically assumed by [CAZA], [TEG] shall be solely responsible and assume liability for all consequences of operations by both parties.” CAZA’s specifically-assumed obligations and liabilities included damages to its equipment, injury to its employees, and certain environmental concerns. The contract also stated that CAZA was required to use “all reasonable means” to prevent well blowouts and to comply with all federal, state, and local government laws, rules, and regulations. There was a blowout, destroying the well. CAZA sued TEG for breach of contract, among other claims. TEG filed a cross-claim against CAZA, alleging that CAZA’s negligence caused the blowout. CAZA moved for summary judgment based on the exculpatory clause in the contract. The trial court granted CAZA summary judgment on the cross-claim. TEG appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Epstein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.