CBS, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
United States Supreme Court
453 U.S. 367 (1981)

- Written by Craig Scheer, JD
Facts
In late 1979, in preparation for the 1980 presidential election campaign, the Carter-Mondale Presidential Committee (the committee) attempted to purchase 30 minutes of television airtime from each of CBS, Inc., American Broadcasting Cos., and National Broadcasting Co. (the networks) (plaintiffs). For various reasons, each of the networks refused to sell the committee the airtime that the committee requested. The committee filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant), alleging the networks violated § 312(a)(7) of the Communications Act of 1934 (Communications Act). The FCC ruled in the committee’s favor, with the FCC’s four Democratic commissioners siding with the committee and its three Republican commissioners opposed. The networks appealed to the court of appeals, which upheld the FCC’s ruling. The United States Supreme Court granted the networks’ petition for certiorari to consider whether the FCC properly interpreted and applied § 312(a)(7). The networks objected to the FCC’s determining when the election campaign commenced for purposes of § 312(a)(7) without giving deference to the networks’ views on that question. The networks also objected to the FCC’s requiring the networks to respond to candidates’ requests for access to airtime on an individualized basis, which effectively precluded the networks from adopting uniform policies to handle these requests. Additionally, the networks alleged that the FCC’s implementation of § 312(a)(7) violated the networks’ First Amendment rights by impinging upon the networks’ editorial discretion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.