CCD, L.C. v. Millsap
Utah Supreme Court
116 P.3d 366 (2005)

- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
In 1997, Craig Newman, Doug Stanley, and Christopher Millsap formed CCD, L.C. (plaintiff), a limited-liability company (LLC) operating as a title company. The CCD operating agreement included a term that prohibited the expulsion of the members of the LLC. All title companies in Utah had to have trust accounts to hold money for real estate transactions and escrow activities. In 2000, Newman and Stanley discovered Millsap had misappropriated over $600,000 from CCD’s trust account. In response, Newman, Stanley, and Millsap entered into an amended operating agreement in which Millsap would no longer access CCD trust or checking accounts. Furthermore, Newman would loan Millsap a significant sum to help replace the missing trust funds while Millsap repaid the misappropriated money. Additionally, the amended agreement allowed Millsap to return to his full membership in CCD one year after the loan was repaid. After the amended agreement was executed, Newman was asked by the Utah State Insurance Department to investigate the source of funds that Millsap was using to repay the loan. Newman discovered that Millsap had continued to misappropriate trust funds. Newman and Stanley argued that one week after discovering Millsap’s continued misuse of trust-account funds, Millsap’s employment at CCD was ended. Millsap claimed that he was returned to his full membership in the LLC and then sought to retire from the company with all the benefits owed a retiring member pursuant to the initial operating agreement. Millsap contended that he could not be subject to expulsion. Newman and Stanley filed suit against Millsap, alleging that CCD was entitled to expel Millsap as a member. The lower court determined that Millsap could be expelled from the LLC. Millsap appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nehring, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.