CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada
Canada Supreme Court
2004 SCC 13 (2004)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
The Law Society of Upper Canada (the Law Society) (defendants) operated a research library that provided photocopy services for Law Society members. Members could request reproductions of legal materials from the library or photocopy library materials themselves. CCH Canadian Ltd., Thomson Canada Ltd., and Canada Law Book Inc. (the publishers) (plaintiffs) sued the Law Society for copyright infringement for distributing photocopies of the publishers’ works to Law Society members. At trial, the court dismissed most of the publishers’ copyright claims, holding that the works were not original. The court of appeal disagreed, and held that all the works in question were original and hence protected by copyright. The Law Society appealed this decision for some of the works affirmed as copyrighted by the court of appeals, including reported judicial decisions, headnotes preceding these decisions, a case summary, and a topical index. The headnotes included a case summary, a statement of the case, the case title, and other case information. The topical index was a list of cases with headings indicating the main topics and brief summaries of decisions. The judicial decisions were reproductions of decisions, to each of which were added the date of the case; the courts involved; the names of counsel for each side; and lists of cases, statutes, and parallel citations. The publishers also corrected grammatical errors in the decisions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McLachlin, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.