Cedar Cove Efficiency Condominium Association, Inc. v. Cedar Cove Properties
Florida District Court of Appeal
558 So. 2d 475 (1990)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
The Cedar Cove Efficiency Condominium Association (the association) (plaintiff) levied a special assessment against its members to repair weather-damaged balconies and exterior doors. The repairs were overwhelmingly approved by association members. But certain unit owners, including those with ground-floor units without balconies (defendants), challenged the association’s authority to levy the assessment against them when the association sued them to collect the assessment. The challengers contended that the balconies were within the vertical boundaries of how the condominium documents defined a unit, and that under the Florida Condominium Act, common elements included only those portions of condominium property that were not included in a unit, so the balconies were not common elements subject to common-expense assessments. The trial court denied the association’s claim after finding that the balconies were limited common elements that were included in the definition of what constituted a unit, and because condominium documents did not specifically assign responsibility for repairing limited common elements, individual unit owners should be responsible for the repairs. The association appealed, arguing that assessing the costs of limited-common-element repairs fell within its broader authority to levy common-expense assessments to repair and maintain all common elements as well as its authority under the Florida Condominium Act to do what was necessary to protect the building’s structural integrity and aesthetics and to protect association members from liability for unsafe exterior conditions. The association further argued that under the business-judgment rule, it was insulated from liability for its reasonable assessment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.