Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Central Ceilings, Inc. v. National Amusements, Inc.

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
873 N.E.2d 754 (2007)


Facts

In March 2000, Central Ceilings, Inc. (Central) (plaintiff) was hired as a subcontractor by Old Colony Construction Corporation (Old Colony) to do carpentry work on a planned theatre complex owned by National Amusements, Inc. (National) (defendant). Old Colony fell behind in paying Central under the subcontract, and in order to keep the project on schedule for opening by Labor Day weekend, National met with Central and promised that it would pay the amount Old Colony owed Central on the subcontract. Central was uniquely able to complete the needed work due to its special skill and familiarity with the project, and another subcontractor likely would not complete the project in time. Central continued to perform in reliance on National’s promise, but National failed to pay the amount owed by Old Colony and Central sued National for breach of contract. National argued that the oral agreement was unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds as a promise to pay the debt of another. Central won a verdict of $600,000 against National, and National appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Peretta, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.