Central Front Partial Award—Ethiopia’s Claims
Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission
43 I.L.M. 1275 (2004)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Soldiers on both sides of the Eritrea-Ethiopia War raped civilians. Rapes occurred especially frequently where large numbers of troops were stationed for long periods of time near large civilian populations, which had disproportionate numbers of women, children, and elderly people during wartime. Two areas along the Central Front region experienced high numbers of these opportunistic rapes: Irob Wereda in Ethiopia and Senafe Town in Eritrea. After the war, Eritrea and Ethiopia (claimants) both brought claims before the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission asserting that the sexual violence violated human rights. Both sides agreed that civilian rape by occupying forces violated customary international law under the Geneva Conventions. But neither side suggested that the other used rape, other sexual violence, or forced pregnancy as an instrument of war.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.