Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, Inc. v. Goldstene

529 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (2007)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, Inc. v. Goldstene

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

529 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (2007)

Facts

The Clean Air Act (CAA) required the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to maintain air quality by setting vehicle-emission standards for any pollutant that endangered public health or welfare. The CAA preempted state regulations regarding vehicle emissions, but § 209 of the CAA mandated that the EPA grant a waiver of preemption for state regulations that were, in the aggregate, at least as stringent as EPA standards (and if certain other criteria were met). Once a state regulation was granted a waiver, other states that adopted the same regulation would be deemed in compliance with the CAA. A separate federal law, the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), required the Department of Transportation, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, to set federal fuel-economy standards for new vehicles. The EPCA contained a provision requiring the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to consider other federal motor-vehicle standards in developing regulations. Unlike the CAA, the EPCA did not permit a waiver of preemption for state fuel-economy regulations. California enacted aggressive vehicle-emission standards, for which the EPA granted a waiver of preemption under § 209 of the CAA. Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep, Inc. (plaintiff) challenged the state regulations in federal district court and asked the court to find that a state law that was granted a waiver of preemption under the CAA was nevertheless preempted by the EPCA if the state law had a more than de minimis effect on fuel efficiency. The California agency that adopted the regulations (defendant) argued that a state regulation that was granted a waiver of preemption under the CAA was not subject to preemption under the EPCA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ishii, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership