Centro Familiar Cristiano Buenas Nuevas v. City of Yuma

651 F.3d 1163 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Centro Familiar Cristiano Buenas Nuevas v. City of Yuma

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
651 F.3d 1163 (2011)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

The City of Yuma, Arizona (defendant) sought to revitalize its Old Town District (the district) as an entertainment district. Pursuant to this effort, Yuma implemented a regulation that required religious organizations and schools to obtain a conditional-use permit to operate in the district. Notably, regulations allowed membership organizations, except religious organizations, to operate in the district without a conditional-use permit. Many other land uses were allowed to operate in the district without a permit, such as jails and tax-exempt museums. Centro Familiar Cristiano Buenas Nuevas (Centro Familiar) (plaintiff), a church, purchased a vacant building in the district. As a religious organization, Centro Familiar needed a conditional-use permit to operate within the district, so it applied to the City Planning and Zoning Commission (the commission) for a permit. Neighboring property owners opposed the permit because it would not fit in with the efforts to revitalize the district as an entertainment district. A major concern regarding the presence of a church was that state law prohibited new bars, nightclubs, or liquor stores within 300 feet of a church (but not all religious institutions) or a K–12 school, so Centro Familiar’s presence would prevent the issuance of a liquor license for nearby properties. The commission denied Centro Familiar’s permit application, finding that a church would be inconsistent with the redevelopment goals of the district and citing the liquor-license issue as a pivotal factor. Centro Familiar filed an action for a declaratory judgment, seeking invalidation of the zoning regulation treating churches and secular membership organizations differently because it violated the equal-terms provision of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (the religious-land-use act). The district court entered judgment for Yuma. Centro Familiar appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kleinfeld, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership