Centronics Corporation v. Genicom Corporation

562 A.2d 187 (1989)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Centronics Corporation v. Genicom Corporation

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
562 A.2d 187 (1989)

Play video

Facts

Centronics Corporation (Centronics) (plaintiff) contracted to sell business assets to Genicom Corporation (Genicom) (defendant). The contract required an escrow deposit by Genicom of the funds needed to fulfill the contract. The contract stated that the funds would be held by an escrow agent and would not be dispersed until the escrow agent received instruction from counsels for Centronics and Genicom. The contract also contained a provision requiring any disputes over the value of the property to be submitted to arbitration. Centronics and Genicom disputed the value of the property, and the matter was submitted to arbitration. While arbitration was pending, Centronics demanded a partial payment from the escrow funds of monies that were not in dispute. Genicom refused to release payment, arguing that the contract provided that the escrow agent should not release the funds until the completion of arbitration. Centronics brought suit against Genicom in New Hampshire state court, alleging Genicom’s failure to authorize a partial payment of the funds before arbitration violated an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing in the contract. The trial court held that because the contract contained no such provision requiring the partial payment of funds pending arbitration, Genicom did not violate a duty of good faith. Centronics appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms