Centurion Industries, Inc. v. Warren Steurer and Associates

665 F.2d 323 (1981)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Centurion Industries, Inc. v. Warren Steurer and Associates

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
665 F.2d 323 (1981)

DM

Facts

Centurion Industries, Inc. (Centurion) (plaintiff) owned a patent for a type of “teaching device.” Cybernetic Systems, Inc. (Cybernetic) manufactured an electronic “teaching machine.” Alleging patent infringement, Centurion sued Warren Steurer and Associates (defendant) and another party (defendant) in a federal district court in California. The defendants were either both customers of Cybernetic or a customer and a manufacturer’s representative of Cybernetic. Centurion’s attempt to bring Cybernetic into the California suit failed because the court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. Centurion subpoenaed Cybernetic in New Mexico, requesting that is produce documents to be used in the California suit. Cybernetic objected on the ground that the software information sought by Centurion constituted trade secrets. Centurion filed a motion in a federal district court in New Mexico to compel Cybernetic’s production. There was evidence that experts for the defendants in the California action would be given access to Cybernetic’s software information in order to rebut Centurion’s claim of infringement. A magistrate judge granted Centurion’s motion but also issued a protective order limiting access to and use of the disclosed materials. The district court upheld the magistrate’s order. Cybernetic appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms