Certain Norwegian Loans (France v. Norway)

1957 I.C.J. Rep. 9 (July 6)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Certain Norwegian Loans (France v. Norway)

International Court of Justice
1957 I.C.J. Rep. 9 (July 6)

Facts

Before World War I, Norway (defendant) and two Norwegian banks issued bonds to certain French nationals. France (plaintiff) claimed these bonds had clauses promising and guaranteeing payment in gold. However, Norway subsequently passed legislation allowing payment with Bank of Norway notes instead of payment in gold. France proposed that an international dispute-resolution mechanism should resolve the claims of French nationals seeking repayment of these bonds in gold. France and Norway had previously declared acceptance of the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) compulsory jurisdiction under Article 36(2), even though the French Declaration contained a reservation limiting ICJ jurisdiction to matters outside the French national jurisdiction. France brought the claims involving the Norwegian bonds issued to French nationals to the ICJ. Norway objected, arguing that the claims of these French nationals were within the jurisdiction of the Norwegian courts and that these claims were a matter of Norwegian law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Quintana, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership