Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Cestonaro v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
211 F.3d 749 (2000)


Facts

An Italian citizen, Daniele Cestonaro, was shot and killed one evening near his vehicle in the Hospital Street parking lot while he and his family were vacationing in the Virgin Islands. The parking lot fell within the boundaries of the Christiansted National Historic Site that was owned and controlled by the National Park Service (NPS), an agency of the United States Department of Interior (defendant). Daniele’s wife, Giovana (plaintiff), filed suit in federal district court against the NPS under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) and the Virgin Islands Wrongful Death Statute, alleging that the NPS was negligent in failing to provide adequate lighting, signs, or other warnings of the dangers of nighttime parking in the lot. Cestonaro’s complaint alleged that, although the area was not the typical paved and marked parking lot, the general public had used the space as a parking lot since the 1940’s. Additionally, Cestonaro claimed that the NPS was aware that crimes regularly occurred in the lot. Although the NPS did not post signs or warn individuals of the dangers of nighttime parking in the lot, it installed and maintained five large lights illuminating the lot at night. The district court granted the NPS’s motion to dismiss the complaint, finding that the discretionary-function exception to the FTCA’s waiver of sovereign immunity barred Cestonaro’s suit. Cestonaro appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Scirica, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.