Cetacean Community v. Bush

386 F.3d 1169 (2004)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cetacean Community v. Bush

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
386 F.3d 1169 (2004)

SC

Facts

The United States Navy (the government) (defendant) used low-frequency sonar during wartimes and raised-threat situations. The Cetacean Community (the community) (plaintiff) comprised all the world’s whales, porpoises, and dolphins. The name was coined by the community’s self-appointed attorney. The community sued the government, claiming that the use of sonar violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by harming the community. The government filed a motion to dismiss. The ESA granted “any person” the right to sue under the statute. Included in the ESA’s definition of “person” were individuals, corporations, governments, and other entities within the jurisdiction of the United States. The definition did not include animals. Similarly, the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) conferred standing on persons and did not include animals within that definition. The district court granted the motion to dismiss on the ground that the community did not have standing under either the ESA or the APA. The community appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership