Chalick v. Cooper Hospital, et al.

192 F.R.D. 145 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chalick v. Cooper Hospital, et al.

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
192 F.R.D. 145 (2000)

Play video

Facts

Conrad Chalick (plaintiff) brought a medical malpractice suit against Cooper Hospital (defendant), University Radiology Services, and four individual doctors (doctor defendants). Chalick alleged that the doctors’ negligence caused the death of his son, Michael Ellis Chalick, who was involved in a parachuting accident. Chalick also named as defendants John Does 1-50 and Jane Does 1-50, who were meant to stand for unknown doctors and nurses who contributed to Michael Ellis Chalick’s care. In June 1999, the defendants served their Rule 26(a) disclosures, identifying Dr. Richard Burns as a person with relevant knowledge but not disclosing Dr. Burns’ contact information or what knowledge he possessed. Through the deposition testimony of one of the defendant doctors in December 1999, Chalick learned that he had a claim against Dr. Burns. On December 27, 1999, Chalick filed a motion to amend his complaint, adding Dr. Burns as a defendant. The doctor defendants filed a brief in opposition, arguing that the statute of limitations for Chalick’s claim against Dr. Burns had passed and thus Dr. Burns could not be joined.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kugler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership