Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Chalick v. Cooper Hospital, et al.

United States District Court of New Jersey
192 F.R.D. 145 (D.N.J. 2000)


Facts

Conrad Chalick (plaintiff) brought a medical malpractice suit against Cooper Hospital (defendant), University Radiology Services, and four individual doctors (doctor defendants). Chalick alleged that the doctors’ negligence caused the death of his son, Michael Ellis Chalick, who was involved in a parachuting accident. Chalick also named as defendants John Does 1-50 and Jane Does 1-50, who were meant to stand for unknown doctors and nurses who contributed to Michael Ellis Chalick’s care. In June 1999, the defendants served their Rule 26(a) disclosures, identifying Dr. Richard Burns as a person with relevant knowledge but not disclosing Dr. Burns’ contact information or what knowledge he possessed. Through the deposition testimony of one of the defendant doctors in December 1999, Chalick learned that he had a claim against Dr. Burns. On December 27, 1999, Chalick filed a motion to amend his complaint, adding Dr. Burns as a defendant. The doctor defendants filed a brief in opposition, arguing that the statute of limitations for Chalick’s claim against Dr. Burns had passed and thus Dr. Burns could not be joined.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Kugler, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.