Chambers v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2000-218 (2000)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
After his divorce, Horace Chambers (plaintiff) had his wages garnished to pay court-ordered alimony and child-support obligations. Chambers did not include the garnished amounts in his taxable income for 1995 and 1996, claiming that he was a cash-basis taxpayer and never had control over the money that had been garnished from his wages. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) determined a deficiency in Chambers’s income taxes based on Chambers’s failure to include the garnished amounts in his income. Chambers challenged the commissioner’s deficiency notice in United States Tax Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gerber, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.