Chambless v. Parker
Louisiana Court of Appeal
867 So.2d 974 (2004)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Frost Estates was a subdivision in Louisiana that consisted of 18 lots. The lots had all been subdivided and platted from a common owner at the same time. The deeds for 13 of the 18 lots all included the same language imposing building restrictions on the lots. These restrictions provided that only one residence could be located on each lot and that the lots could only be used for residential purposes. Sheila Parker (defendant) purchased two of the lots in the subdivision and intended to use them to rent out mobile-home sites. Parker placed four mobile homes on the property, began renting them, and offered more sites as available to rent on the lots. Both of Parker’s lots had been among the 13 lots that had originally included the building restrictions. A group of other property owners in the subdivision (the other owners) (plaintiffs) sued Parker for violating the building restrictions by having multiple residences and operating a commercial business on her lots. The trial court granted the other owners’ motion for summary judgment, finding that Parker was violating the building restrictions. Parker appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Peatross, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.