Chan v. Korean Air Lines

490 U.S. 122 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chan v. Korean Air Lines

United States Supreme Court
490 U.S. 122 (1989)

RW

Facts

The Warsaw Convention (convention), an international treaty drafted in 1925 and 1929, addressed the rights and duties of international air carriers. Section I of the convention capped a carrier’s liability for passenger deaths or injuries at $8,300. Sections II and III of the convention provided separate liability limits for damage to baggage or cargo. All three sections waived these liability caps and subjected carriers to unlimited liability if the carriers failed to issue passenger or shipper documents referring to the convention’s liability rules. However, whereas Sections II and III required carriers to describe the convention’s liability rules in detail, similar detail requirements did not appear in Section I. In 1983, a Russian jet fighter shot down an airliner operated by Korean Air Lines, Ltd. (KAL) (defendant), killing everyone on board. Elisa Chan and other surviving relatives (families) (plaintiffs) of the flight’s passengers invoked the convention and sued KAL for damages in federal district court. The families sought to overcome the convention’s $8,300 liability cap by arguing that the eight-point type of KAL’s passenger tickets failed to describe the convention’s liability rules in any detail. KAL responded that Section I of the convention did not require the same degree of detail prescribed by Sections II and III. The families attributed this difference to a simple drafting error and moved for summary judgment that KAL was subject to unlimited liability. The court denied the motion and was affirmed by the circuit court on appeal. The families took their appeal to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

Concurrence (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership