Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Chandler v. Southwest Jeep-Eagle, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
162 F.R.D. 302 (1995)


Facts

Raymond Chandler (plaintiff) purchased a car from Southwest Jeep-Eagle (Southwest) (defendant), a car dealership. As part of his purchase, he sought to buy a warranty that would allow him to service his vehicle at any Chrysler dealership. He was presented with the paperwork and told that he would have to pay a standard payment of $1,780.40. He was not aware that this was a negotiable sum. The contract was assigned to Calumet National Bank (defendant). After signing the warranty, Southwest only transferred a small sum to Chrysler, keeping the rest for itself. Shortly after purchasing the car, it began to break down, forcing Chandler to repeatedly return to Southwest. He was unable to fully repair the car, as there were near-constant problems with it. Chandler finally brought the car to another Chrysler dealership seeking to use the warranty he purchased. Chandler was informed that there was no record of a warranty being filed by Southwest. Chandler sued under, among other statutes, the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act). Chandler sought to have a class certified for all those individuals who had dealt with Southwest over this type of contract. He estimated that there were approximately fifty class members for the TILA count and approximately 150 for the Consumer Fraud Act Count.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Castillo, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.