Chapin v. Knight-Ridder, Inc.

993 F.2d 1087 (1993)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chapin v. Knight-Ridder, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
993 F.2d 1087 (1993)

Facts

Roger Chapin, through his charity, Help Hospitalized Veterans, Inc. (HHV) (plaintiffs), operated a program during the Persian Gulf War that sent “gift pacs” to soldiers in Saudi Arabia. At the peak of the program’s popularity, the Philadelphia Enquirer, a publication of Knight-Ridder (defendant), ran an article written by Frank Greve about the program. The article highlighted the high cost of purchasing a gift pac compared with the wholesale price of the items included and questioned what happened to the leftover money. The article suggested both favorable and unfavorable potential explanations and asked questions but did not draw any conclusions. The sale of gift pacs dropped substantially after the article was published. Chapin and HHV sued Knight-Ridder in Virginia federal court, arguing that the implications of Greve’s article, not the facts stated in it, were false and constituted libel. Knight-Ridder filed a motion to dismiss the libel claim because it was not actionable, which the district court granted. Chapin and HHV appealed the order granting the motion to dismiss.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership