Chapin v. Knight-Ridder, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
993 F.2d 1087 (1993)
- Written by Sara Adams, JD
Facts
Roger Chapin, through his charity, Help Hospitalized Veterans, Inc. (HHV) (plaintiffs), operated a program during the Persian Gulf War that sent “gift pacs” to soldiers in Saudi Arabia. At the peak of the program’s popularity, the Philadelphia Enquirer, a publication of Knight-Ridder (defendant), ran an article written by Frank Greve about the program. The article highlighted the high cost of purchasing a gift pac compared with the wholesale price of the items included and questioned what happened to the leftover money. The article suggested both favorable and unfavorable potential explanations and asked questions but did not draw any conclusions. The sale of gift pacs dropped substantially after the article was published. Chapin and HHV sued Knight-Ridder in Virginia federal court, arguing that the implications of Greve’s article, not the facts stated in it, were false and constituted libel. Knight-Ridder filed a motion to dismiss the libel claim because it was not actionable, which the district court granted. Chapin and HHV appealed the order granting the motion to dismiss.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.