Chaplin v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
537 F. Supp. 1224 (1982)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
The Epilepsy Foundation of America and Phyllis Chaplin (plaintiffs) brought an action against Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Edison) (defendant) for a violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701. Edison provided a settlement agreement to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs notified Edison that they had objections to the proposed settlement. Edison provided another letter to the plaintiffs, stating that it was willing to finalize the previously offered settlement agreement, but that if the settlement agreement was not accepted as proposed, Edison would withdraw all offers to settle. The plaintiffs sent a letter to Edison stating that they did not accept the offered settlement agreement. The plaintiffs later had a change of heart and sent a second letter to Edison, stating that they accepted the offer of settlement. The plaintiffs then moved the court to enjoin Edison to execute the settlement agreement, arguing that their second letter constituted a binding acceptance, creating a contract between the plaintiffs and Edison to settle the case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lasker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.