Chaplin v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
537 F. Supp. 1224 (1982)
The Epilepsy Foundation of America and Phyllis Chaplin (plaintiffs) brought an action against Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Edison) (defendant) for a violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701. Edison provided a settlement agreement to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs notified Edison that they had objections to the proposed settlement. Edison provided another letter to the plaintiffs, stating that it was willing to finalize the previously offered settlement agreement, but that if the settlement agreement was not accepted as proposed, Edison would withdraw all offers to settle. The plaintiffs sent a letter to Edison stating that they did not accept the offered settlement agreement. The plaintiffs later had a change of heart and sent a second letter to Edison, stating that they accepted the offer of settlement. The plaintiffs then moved the court to enjoin Edison to execute the settlement agreement, arguing that their second letter constituted a binding acceptance, creating a contract between the plaintiffs and Edison to settle the case.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lasker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.