Chaplin v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
81 U.S. App. D.C. 80, 157 F.2d 697 (1946)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Sydney Chaplin and his wife Dorothy Chaplin (defendants) were in the liquor business, and they told Violette McMullen about this business. The Chaplins told McMullen that if she would advance a certain sum of money to them, they would use the money to purchase state liquor stamps for the business and then repay the advanced money to McMullen. The Chaplins had no intention of actually using McMullen’s money to purchase liquor stamps or of ever returning the advanced money to her. McMullen gave the Chaplins hundreds of dollars over a period of time. The Chaplins purchased less than $40 worth of liquor stamps with the money, and never repaid any of the money to McMullen. The Chaplins were charged and convicted of obtaining money under false pretenses, and appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
Dissent (Edgerton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.