Chapline v. State

George Chapline and M.D.L. Cook (defendants) were indicted for conspiracy to commit bribery. The indictment alleged that they agreed to pay approximately $1,400 to members of the Arkansas General Assembly to influence their votes in favor of House Bill No. 135. Evidence presented at trial showed that after the bill initially failed in the House, Chapline met with A.F. Mayberry and others who supported the bill. During this meeting, Chapline stated that it would require about $1,000 to secure passage of the bill and suggested hiring a lobbyist to “see certain members of the House.” When asked whether the money was a corruption fund, Chapline replied that it was for “expenses.” Mayberry was chosen to manage the funds and hire someone to assist in securing the bill’s passage. Chapline introduced Mayberry to Cook as someone who could “be of service.” Cook reiterated that “nearly all of these important bills are passed with the use of money” and estimated that it would take at least $1,500 to ensure passage. Mayberry raised $1,475, which was placed in escrow to be paid to Cook upon the bill’s enactment. The bill later passed the legislature but was vetoed by the governor, and the money was returned to those who paid it. A jury found Chapline guilty of conspiracy to commit bribery. The circuit court entered judgment accordingly. Chapline appealed, arguing that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain the verdict.