Charalambous v. Charalambous
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
627 F.3d 462 (2010)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Savvas Charalambous (plaintiff) was a citizen of Cyprus, and Elizabeth Charalambous (defendant) was a citizen of the United States. Savvas and Elizabeth were married and lived in Cyprus. The Charalambouses had two children. Elizabeth took the children to Maine to visit her family, but never returned with the children to Cyprus. When it became clear that Elizabeth did not intend to return with the children, Savvas filed a petition under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the Convention), seeking an order requiring the children’s return to Cyprus. At trial, Elizabeth presented evidence that she had been verbally abused by Savvas and physically abused by Savvas on one occasion. The children did not witness any of this abuse. Elizabeth stated that she would not return to Cyprus due to her own fears. The district court ordered the children’s return to Cyprus, finding no grave risk of physical or psychological harm to the children if they were returned. Elizabeth appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.