Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

454 U.S. 404 (1982)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

United States Supreme Court
454 U.S. 404 (1982)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

A local Teamsters Union represented drivers and helpers who worked for linen suppliers in New England. Ten linen suppliers, including Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. (Bonanno) (defendant), formed a multiemployer unit to negotiate with the Teamsters. Bonanno’s president joined the association’s negotiating committee and authorized it to represent Bonanno. When negotiations reached an impasse, the union initiated a selective strike against Bonanno that resulted in most of the linen suppliers locking out their drivers. Bonanno hired new drivers to permanently replace all its striking drivers and purportedly withdrew from the association. The other suppliers ended the lockout and resumed multiemployer negotiations without Bonanno, resulting in a new contract. The union challenged Bonanno’s withdrawing from the multiemployer unit without consent as an unfair labor practice, arguing that the new contract should bind Bonanno. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found Bonanno’s withdrawal untimely and ineffective and ordered it to sign and adhere to the new contract retroactively. The appellate court affirmed, and Bonanno appealed to the Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 787,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Employment Law
Labor Law

Key Terms