Charlottesville Music Center, Inc. v. McCray

205 S.E.2d 674, 215 Va. 31, 205 (1974)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Charlottesville Music Center, Inc. v. McCray

Virginia Supreme Court
205 S.E.2d 674, 215 Va. 31, 205 (1974)

Facts

Jeffrey A. McCray was 15 years old when he was killed helping his friends install shelving at the Charlottesville Music Center, Inc. (Music Center) (defendant). Jeffrey’s friend, Calvin (Chip) Jarvis, Jr., was at the store installing the shelving because Chip’s father had sold the shelving to the store. Jeffrey and another friend came to the store to help Chip. The store manager was aware that Chip had two friends helping and tacitly approved. The Music Center did not make any promise to compensate any of the boys for their work, and none of the boys expected to receive any compensation for their work. While operating a wooden cargo hoist, Jeffrey and the hoist fell to the Music Center’s basement, and Jeffrey was killed. The administrator of Jeffrey’s estate, Ollie T. McCray (plaintiff), filed a wrongful-death suit against the Music Center. Ollie was awarded a $25,000 judgment. The Music Center appealed, arguing that Jeffrey was a Music Center employee under an implied contract of hire because the Music Center had the right to control Jeffrey’s performance, and therefore Ollie’s exclusive remedy was workers’ compensation, not a wrongful-death suit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (l’Anson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership