Chateau des Charmes Wines, Ltd. v. Sabaté USA, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
328 F.3d 528 (2003)
- Written by Zachary Linowitz, JD
Facts
Sabaté France (defendant) manufactures special wine corks that it claims will not cause “cork taint” spoilage. It sells the corks through a wholly owned California subsidiary, Sabaté USA, Inc. (defendant). Canadian winery Chateau des Charmes Wines, Ltd. (plaintiff) agreed by phone to purchase a number of corks and also to specific payment and shipping terms. Sabaté France’s invoices specified that any dispute arising under the contract is to be brought before a court in France. Shortly after delivery, Chateau des Charmes noticed that its wine was tainted by cork flavors. Chateau des Charmes filed suit in federal district court in California, alleging claims for, among others, breach of contract, strict liability, and false advertising. Sabaté France and Sabaté USA filed a motion to dismiss based on the forum selection clauses printed in the invoices. Holding that the clauses were valid and enforceable, the district court dismissed the action. Chateau des Charmes appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curium)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.