Chatlos Systems v. National Cash Register

479 F. Supp. 738 (1979)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chatlos Systems v. National Cash Register

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
479 F. Supp. 738 (1979)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Chatlos Systems, Inc. (CSI) (plaintiff) designed and manufactured telecommunications equipment. CSI wanted a computer system, including hardware and related software, that could handle six functions: accounts receivable, payroll, order entry, inventory deletion, state income tax, and cash receipts. NCR Corporation (NCR) (defendant) approached CSI, became familiar with CSI’s needs, and represented that a specified computer system (the computer system) would perform the six functions, result in direct savings of labor costs, solve inventory problems, be programmed by capable NCR personnel, and be operational by March 1975. In reliance on NCR’s representations, CSI entered a financing transaction with a bank to lease the computer system, which was valued at about $75,800. Thereafter, NCR personnel repeatedly attempted to install the computer system at CSI but encountered technical problems. The only function that was operational by March 1975 was payroll. The state-income-tax function was not operational until September 1976. The other four functions never properly operated. CSI fully cooperated with NCR until September 1976, at which time CSI refused further accommodations. CSI sued NCR for breach of express and implied warranties. The court held a trial and received evidence on the transaction history and CSI’s damages, including the actual value of the computer system at the time of acceptance of about $6,000 and certain incidental or consequential damages sustained by CSI. For example, CSI did not save money on employee salaries and lost profits from not having an operational, automated computer system. NCR argued that the parties’ sales contract limited consequential damages to the repair or replacement of defective parts.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Whipple, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership