Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 16,500+ case briefs...

Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local No. 391 v. Terry

United States Supreme Court
494 U.S. 558 (1990)


 

Facts

A struggling business, McLean Trucking Company, engaged in some dubious labor practices, ending with McLean firing twenty-seven unionized truckers. The fired truckers (plaintiffs) launched grievances against McLean. As required by law, they were represented by their union, Teamsters and Helpers, Local No. 391 (defendant). But in one of the proceedings, the union also represented other union members with seemingly adverse interests. After losing in the grievance proceeding, the truckers sued their union in federal court, alleging poor representation and seeking damages. The truckers asked for a jury trial, but the union demanded a bench trial. The district court, citing the Seventh Amendment, ordered a jury trial. The Fourth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

Concurrence (Stevens, J.)

Concurrence (Brennan, J.)

Dissent (Kennedy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 410,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,500 briefs, keyed to 223 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


How are they defining an equitable claim v. a legal claim in this case? If an equitable claim is asking for monetary damages, what makes it equitable rather than legal?

Want to see this answer?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and get access to all answers in our Q&A database

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial

Tempor minim nulla id mollit ullamco consequat aliquip adipisicing irure officia tempor. Magna sit eiusmod laborum proident laboris ex sunt. Non labore ex officia irure qui et laboris aliqua in minim. Labore velit aliqua proident officia cillum occaecat dolore tempor. Ullamco in consequat labore amet laborum proident reprehenderit anim cillum excepteur. Elit do nostrud nisi excepteur sit dolor pariatur fugiat. Nisi incididunt incididunt do est velit excepteur enim excepteur incididunt mollit pariatur. Irure tempor non in esse do. Laboris eiusmod in ad ut enim est duis ad sint veniam eiusmod.