Chavarria v. Ralphs Grocery Co.

733 F.3d 916 (2013)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chavarria v. Ralphs Grocery Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
733 F.3d 916 (2013)

Play video

Facts

Zenia Chavarria (plaintiff), a former deli clerk, filed a class-action lawsuit against Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs) (defendant), alleging labor-code violations. Ralphs moved to compel arbitration of the matter pursuant to the company’s arbitration policy (policy). Ralphs required all job applicants to agree to be bound by the policy as a condition of applying; however, Chavarria was not provided a copy of the policy until three weeks after she had been hired. The policy contained three provisions that Chavarria argued made it unconscionable. First, the policy’s rules for selecting an arbitrator prohibited the use of an arbitrator from the American Arbitration Association (AAA) or the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service (JAMS). The selection rules also guaranteed that employee-initiated arbitration would always result in the use of an arbitrator chosen by Ralphs. Second, the policy required the arbitrator’s fees to be apportioned at the beginning of arbitration and required arbitration fees, which cost up to $14,000 per day, to be split equally between the parties in all but a narrow minority of circumstances. Third, Ralphs was permitted to unilaterally change the policy without notifying the employee. The employee’s continued employment was to be deemed acceptance of any changes. The district court found the policy to be unconscionable and denied Ralphs motion to compel arbitration. Ralphs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clifton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership