Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Chavez v. Arte Publico Press

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
204 F.3d 601 (2000)


Facts

Chavez (plaintiff) sued the University of Houston (university) (defendant) for copyright infringement. The university opposed the lawsuit, arguing that it had sovereign immunity against unconsented-to lawsuits under the Eleventh Amendment and that the waiver of sovereign immunity asserted by the federal Copyright Remedy Clarification Act (CRCA) was unconstitutional. The legislative history of the CRCA shows that shows that Congress was concerned with preventing unconstitutional takings under the Fourteenth Amendment, rather than remedying any existing, widespread abuse by the states. Indeed, the legislative history only showed seven instances of states violating due-process rights of copyright holders because of sovereign immunity. Additionally, Congress did not thoroughly study existing state remedies to copyright infringement. At trial, one witness testified that his attorney had advised him that state courts were not available for copyright-infringement claims, and a report was submitted showing existing state waivers to the Eleventh Amendment. The legislative history also showed that Congress decided against allowing state courts to hear copyright claims, because doing so would undermine uniformity of the copyright laws. Finally, the CRCA does not limit the waiver of sovereign immunity to intentional violations, instead following the copyright standard considering intent only for calculating damages.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.