Cheesecake Factory, Inc. v. Baines

964 P.2d 183 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cheesecake Factory, Inc. v. Baines

New Mexico Court of Appeals
964 P.2d 183 (1998)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD
Play video

Facts

Cheesecake Factory (plaintiff) sold goods to Triples American Grill (Triples), a restaurant owned by Triple Threat, Inc., on a line of credit. Steve Mager, president of Cheesecake Factory, believed that Triples was owned by a partnership based on statements made by Frank Kolk claiming Triples was owned by Kolk, Bob Baines (defendant), and a third partner. Baines acted in a manner that indicated he was a partner in a partnership that owned Triples. Baines opened a bank account signing his name as an owner of Triples. Baines represented himself as a partner in the business, claiming he “had a sports bar” and “was a partner.” Mager testified that he relied on the belief that Triples was owned by a partnership and would not have extended credit to a corporation due to limited liability rules. Cheesecake Factory filed a lawsuit seeking to hold Baines personally liable for the debts of Triples. The district court found Baines to be a partner by estoppel based on Cheesecake Factory’s reasonable belief that Triples was owned by a partnership, not a corporation, and the district court entered judgment for Cheesecake Factory. Baines appealed to the New Mexico Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hartz, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership