From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Chemical Bank v. Pic Motors Corp.
Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division
452 N.Y.S.2d 41 (1982)
Pic Motors Corporation (Pic) (defendant) entered into an inventory-financing agreement with Chemical Bank (plaintiff), under which Chemical Bank agreed to periodically lend to Pic funds to purchase vehicles, with Pic’s inventory of vehicles used as collateral. Chemical Bank periodically inspected Pic’s inventory to ensure that Pic actually owned the vehicles that were being financed. Aaron Siegel was the director, president, and principal stockholder of Pic and personally guaranteed payment on the loans. This guarantee provided that Siegel’s consent was not necessary for security for the loans to be exchanged or released or for Pic’s obligation on the loan to be extended, waived, or released. Siegel sold his interest in Pic, but his personal guarantee continued. Chemical Bank discovered that more than half of the vehicles that had supposedly been financed by Chemical Bank’s loans were missing from Pic’s inventory. Siegel arranged for the sale of Pic’s inventory and used the proceeds to partially pay off the loan. Chemical Bank brought an action as a guarantor to recover the balance against Pic and Siegel. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Chemical Bank. Siegel appealed, arguing that the deficiency was caused by Chemical Bank’s failure to conduct a regular inspection of Pic’s inventory and that employees of Chemical Bank had falsified inventory reports and approved loans on nonexistent vehicles.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fein, J.)
Dissent (Milonas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.