Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Chemical Bank v. Rinden Professional Association

498 A.2d 706 (1985)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

Chemical Bank v. Rinden Professional Association

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

498 A.2d 706 (1985)

Facts

Intertel installed an office telephone system for a law firm, Rinden Professional Association (Rinden) (defendant) pursuant to a lease/purchase contract, under which Rinden would make monthly payments up to a certain date. Subsequently, Rinden received a notice that Chemical Bank (Chemical) (plaintiff) planned to purchase the payment rights from Intertel. This document required Rinden's consent to make payments to Chemical and provided, in part, that Rinden agree that this obligation would be “absolutely unconditional” and payable whether or not the lease was terminated, notwithstanding any defenses or claims it had or may have against Intertel. Rinden's office manager consented to the notice document after which Chemical Bank paid Intertel $8,800 for the assignment of Intertel's right to receive payments from Rinden. After three years of making payments to Chemical, the phone system developed serious malfunctions. Rinden replaced the phone system and refused to make further payments. An action was then commenced and the evidence was reviewed by a special master who issued a report in favor of Chemical. Intertel, in the meantime, went into bankruptcy. Representatives of Chemical testified at trial that Chemical and Intertel were not interrelated and that Chemical’s investigation of the Intertel account revealed no claims or defenses regarding the lease/purchase agreement. Rinden appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership