Chen v. Gonzales

471 F.3d 315 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chen v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
471 F.3d 315 (2006)

  • Written by Christopher Bova, JD

Facts

Chen (plaintiff) was born in China and fled to the United States after the Chinese government forced her to undergo an abortion and threatened to sterilize her. Eleven months after arriving in the United States, she was detained and ordered to appear at a removal hearing. She filed an application for asylum nearly fifteen months after entering the United States. The immigration judge rejected her application because she did not file it within a year of arriving in the country. He ruled that she had not established “changed circumstances” affecting her eligibility or “extraordinary circumstances” that would excuse her late filing. He also ruled that even if she had filed her petition on time, she had not established a credible case of persecution. The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the immigration judge’s ruling. Chen then petitioned the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cabranes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership