Chen v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
471 F.3d 315 (2006)
- Written by Christopher Bova, JD
Facts
Chen (plaintiff) was born in China and fled to the United States after the Chinese government forced her to undergo an abortion and threatened to sterilize her. Eleven months after arriving in the United States, she was detained and ordered to appear at a removal hearing. She filed an application for asylum nearly fifteen months after entering the United States. The immigration judge rejected her application because she did not file it within a year of arriving in the country. He ruled that she had not established “changed circumstances” affecting her eligibility or “extraordinary circumstances” that would excuse her late filing. He also ruled that even if she had filed her petition on time, she had not established a credible case of persecution. The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the immigration judge’s ruling. Chen then petitioned the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cabranes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.