Chen v. Street Beat Sportswear, Inc.

226 F. Supp. 2d 355 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chen v. Street Beat Sportswear, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
226 F. Supp. 2d 355 (2002)

SC

Facts

Fen Chen and others (plaintiffs) worked for Street Beat Sportswear, Inc. (Street Beat) (defendant). Chen worked extremely long hours with only one or two days off each year. Chen was not paid overtime. The United States Department of Labor (DOL) previously had found that Street Beat violated the Fair Labor Standards Act. As a result, Street Beat signed an agreement with the DOL, agreeing to a compliance program to ensure that its factories complied with the Fair Labor Standards Act. The agreement required Street Beat to pay its workers minimum wage and overtime. The agreement also required Street Beat to pay DOL backpay that was owed to Street Beat’s employees. DOL would then disburse the money to employees such as Chen to make them whole. The agreement contained a strict timeline for such payments. The agreement did not have any language limiting its enforcement powers to DOL. Chen sued Street Beat for breach of contract, alleging that Street Beat violated the agreement with DOL and that he and other workers were third-party beneficiaries of the agreement. Street Beat filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that its workers were only incidental beneficiaries of the agreement and thus could not enforce it.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Glasser, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership