Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia

541 U.S. 913 (2004)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
C
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia

United States Supreme Court
541 U.S. 913 (2004)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Sierra Club and Judicial Watch, Inc. (plaintiffs) brought consolidated lawsuits against then-Vice President Cheney and other senior executives on an advisory committee in their official capacities, alleging failure to comply with disclosure laws. Before the case reached the Supreme Court, Justice Scalia invited Cheney on a duck-hunting trip. Cheney hunted two days and the two never shared a blind or were alone together except brief unintentional instances. Scalia said he and Cheney never discussed the case. When it reached the Supreme Court, Sierra Club moved to disqualify Scalia. Judicial Watch did not join the motion, publicly stating that it did not believe the known facts required Scalia’s recusal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Administrative Law
Legal Ethics
Legislation and Regulation

Key Terms