Cheong v. Antablin
Supreme Court of California
946 P.2d 817 (1997)
On April 11, 1991, Wilkie Cheong (plaintiff) and Drew Antablin (defendant) went for a ski trip together. Both were experienced skiers, but they collided with one another, and Cheong was injured. Cheong sued Antablin for negligence. At trial, Antablin denied intentionally crashing into Cheong or skiing recklessly, and Cheong conceded that he did not believe Antablin had acted recklessly. Antablin’s motion for summary judgment was granted by the superior court, which found that the risk of a collision was an inherent risk of downhill skiing and that Cheong had assumed that risk by willingly participating in the sport. Cheong appealed, but the court of appeals affirmed the decision. Cheong appealed again, arguing that the doctrine of assumption of the risk did not apply to an individual sport such as skiing.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
Concurrence (Kennard, J.)
Concurrence (Mosk, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.