Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.

463 N.W.2d 522 (1990)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.

Minnesota Supreme Court
463 N.W.2d 522 (1990)

RW
Play video

Facts

Crosstown Bell, Inc. (Crosstown) (codefendant) rented property to Northwestern Bell Telephone Company (Northwestern) under a lease-purchase agreement. In 1977, Crosstown and George Chergosky (plaintiff) executed a contract for deed that, in return for monthly payments, would eventually convey the property to Chergosky. The contract obligated Crosstown to repurchase the property if Northwestern exercised its purchase option. Even though the contract went unrecorded for years, it gave Chergosky an equitable ownership interest in the property. Robert Griffith (codefendant), a friend and close associate of Crosstown's sole owner, was well aware of the contract's existence. In 1978, Crosstown secured a loan by giving Summit State Bank (Summit) a second mortgage on the property. Summit was a bona fide purchaser because it had no knowledge of the 1977 contract for deed. In 1982, Northwestern notified Crosstown that it would exercise its purchase option, and in January 1983 Crosstown sued Northwestern on the grounds that the notification was not timely. In March 1983, Griffith loaned Crosstown money, and in return, Crosstown gave Griffith a majority interest in the property's ownership. In August 1985, Griffith paid Summit to assign its second mortgage to him, and he recorded the lien. In October 1985, the court rendered its judgment in the 1983 litigation and awarded ownership of the property to Northwestern. Chergosky sued Crosstown and asked the trial court to resolve the relative priority of his and Griffith's claims on the property. The court ruled that Crosstown had breached the contract, and that Chergosky's claim had priority over Griffith's. The appellate court affirmed as to breach of contract but reversed as to the priority of claims. Chergosky appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Keith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership