Cherry-Burrell Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
367 F.2d 669 (1966)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Cherry-Burrell Corporation (CBC) (plaintiff) owned all the preferred stock and the majority of the common stock of Cherry-Burrell Limited (Limited), an English corporation. CBC sought to liquidate Limited and formed a plan to do so. CBC secured a letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) finding that Limited’s liquidation did not have a principal purpose of avoiding taxes and so could be liquidated tax-free if all statutory requirements were met. One statutory requirement was that a liquidation be completed within three years of the date on which the first distribution according to the plan of liquidation was made. Shortly after Limited began the process of liquidating, it was sued in England for claims of which CBC was not aware. The British courts required that some of Limited’s assets be held until resolution of the lawsuit. The lawsuit was not ultimately settled until more than six years later. Within a month of settlement, Limited was able to distribute the last of its assets, completing its liquidation. The IRS treated the final distribution as taxable to CBC, finding that Limited did not satisfy the three-year requirement for a tax-free liquidation. CBC disagreed and sued for a refund in district court. The district court agreed with the IRS, and CBC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.