Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. Martin
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 209, 51 S.Ct. 453 (1931)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway (Chesapeake) (defendant) agreed to ship a load of potatoes from Michigan to Virginia for Martin (plaintiff). Under the bill of lading, any claim for loss had to be brought within six months “after a reasonable time for delivery.” The potatoes were delivered to the wrong warehouse six days after shipment and had spoiled by the time Martin found them. Six months and 20 days after the shipment, Martin sued Chesapeake in Virginia court. At trial, a Chesapeake employee testified that a reasonable time for shipment would be eight days. The employee was not cross-examined on the issue, and no evidence was offered to refute the assertion. Chesapeake demurred, which is the same as a motion for a directed verdict under Virginia law. The demurrer was overruled, and a jury verdict was returned in favor of Martin. The appellate court affirmed. Chesapeake petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari, which was granted to consider the federal question involving the bill of lading under the Interstate Commerce Act.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sutherland, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.