Cheshire National Bank v. Smith

427 F. Supp. 277 (1977)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cheshire National Bank v. Smith

United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire
427 F. Supp. 277 (1977)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

The McFadden Act of 1927 permitted national banks to operate branch banks only to the extent that state banks were permitted to operate branch banks under state law. After the act was passed, certain branch banks were eligible to continue operations under the grandfather clause of 12 U.S.C. § 36(a) despite noncompliance with state or federal law. The grandfather clause permitted a branch bank to be maintained if it had been continuously operated for a period of more than 25 years immediately preceding 1927 and if the national bank invoking the grandfather clause had only one branch that qualified. In 1865, Keene National Bank of Keene (Keene Bank) was chartered as a national bank association. Keene Bank had continuously conducted business since 1865. At that time, national bank associations were allowed only one office location. However, starting in 1872, Keene Bank’s board of directors authorized Josiah Bellows to hold $500 in Walpole, New Hampshire, to provide various banking services like cashing checks or making loans. Keene Bank employed an agent in Walpole until May of 1975. For most of that time, Keene Bank’s business was conducted at the office of the Savings Bank of Walpole (Walpole Bank). The employee was paid by both Walpole Bank and Keene Bank. Due to changes in banking laws in 1974, Walpole Bank gained the ability to offer checking services similar to Keene Bank. As a result, Walpole Bank evicted Keene Bank from Walpole Bank’s premises in May 1975. Keene Bank notified the United States Comptroller of the Currency, James Smith (defendant) that it was being evicted. The comptroller temporarily permitted Keene Bank to relocate its services from Walpole Bank pending an administrative review. Upon review, the comptroller found that Keene Bank’s Walpole operations satisfied § 36(a), so the operations at Walpole were grandfathered as a legal branch bank of Keene Bank. Cheshire National Bank of Keene and Connecticut River National Bank of Charlestown (plaintiffs) sued the comptroller, seeking the invalidation of the comptroller’s approval of Keene Bank’s relocation of its Walpole operations.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bownes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership