Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal

536 U.S. 73 (2002)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal

United States Supreme Court

536 U.S. 73 (2002)

Play video

Facts

Mario Echazabal (plaintiff) worked for an independent contractor at an oil refinery owned by Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (Chevron) (defendant). Echazabal twice applied for a full-time job at Chevron, and each time Chevron agreed to hire him if he could pass the company’s required physical examination. Both times, Echazabal’s exams showed liver damage caused by Hepatitis C. Chevron’s doctors advised that Echazabal’s liver condition would be exacerbated by ongoing exposure to oil-refinery toxins. Chevron withdrew its offer to hire Echazabal and later asked Echazabal’s supervising contractor to reassign him to a different job with less exposure to toxic substances or remove him from the refinery. Echazabal was eventually laid off. Echazabal sued Chevron under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., alleging unlawful disability discrimination. Chevron invoked an affirmative defense, set forth by an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulation, that hiring Echazabal would have posed a direct threat to Echazabal’s health due to his preexisting condition. The district court granted summary judgment to Chevron, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, concluding that the ADA permitted a defense based on threats to other individuals in the workplace, but not threats to the disabled employee himself. Chevron sought review by the United States Supreme Court, which was granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 606,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership